lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2024eb sj lawyermonthly 800x90 dalyblack (1)

Legal Firms Risk Losing Custom by Playing Generic Music on Hold

In this Article
Reading Time:
2
 minutes
Posted: 17th August 2016 by
Lawyer Monthly
Last updated 12th September 2016
Share this article

Legal firms’ call handling standards have come into question as the result of a major new study into telephone practice.

The research conducted by audio branding specialist PHMG, which audited 766 firms in the legal trade, discovered the large majority risk losing custom by subjecting customers to generic music and audio while on hold.

Typically, waiting on hold is seen as a major bugbear but 51% of legal firms still leave customers listening to nothing but generic music. A further 25% subject callers to beeps, while 18% leave them in silence and 4% force them to listen to ringing.

Only one per cent employ brand-consistent voice and music messaging - viewed as the best practice approach to handling calls – which is less than the national average of 2%.

Mark Williamson, Sales and Marketing Director at PHMG, said: “Call handling remains a critically undervalued element of customer service and marketing. A previous study of 1,000 UK consumers found 73% will not do business with a company again if their first call isn’t handled satisfactorily.

“Therefore, it is important companies do their utmost to improve the experience. The research shows there is still work to be done in providing an experience that keeps callers engaged and entertained.

“Generic music, beeps, ringing or silence convey a message that the customer is not valued, which will only serve to compound any annoyance felt as a result of being made to wait on hold.”

The research also found 96% of legal firms do not even use auto attendant messaging to greet customers who call up outside of normal working hours.

It also seems call handling standards have not significantly improved when comparing the results to a similar study conducted in 2013. The number of companies playing repetitive music has increased by 24% during that period and there has been a 2% improvement in the number using brand-consistent voice and music.

“The trends over the past three years suggest legal firms believe generic music is enough to keep callers entertained but this can actually have the opposite effect,” added Williamson.

“An existing, generic piece of music should not be repurposed to convey a message it was never intended to, as its characteristics may not match those of the company.

Hearing is one of our most powerful emotional senses so the sounds customers hear when they call a business will create a long-lasting impression. Every element of a music track, whether tempo, pitch or instrumentation, will stir different emotions so traders should ensure they convey the appropriate brand image.”

(Source: PHMG)

About Lawyer Monthly

Lawyer Monthly is a news website and monthly legal publication with content that is entirely defined by the significant legal news from around the world.