Former Female Athletes File Lawsuit Against NCAA and Ivy League Over Transgender Athlete's Participation.

Three former athletes from the University of Pennsylvania's women's swimming team have taken legal action in a bid to remove the records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas from official standings. The lawsuit, filed against the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, the NCAA, and the Ivy League Council of Presidents, seeks to address what the plaintiffs describe as “traumatising” experiences during the 2021-22 season.

The Lawsuit's Allegations

Grace Estabrook, Ellen Holmquist, and Margot Kaczorowski claim that these institutions violated federal law by allowing Thomas to compete against female swimmers and access the women’s locker room. The lawsuit was filed on Tuesday, just one day before President Donald Trump signed an executive order prohibiting transgender women from participating in women’s sports.

In the complaint, the athletes argue that their participation in the 2022 Ivy League Swimming and Diving Championships at Harvard has been marred by what they call the "illegal social science experiment" forced upon them. They aim to establish a class-action lawsuit on behalf of 206 female athletes and seek the removal of Thomas’s records from the Ivy League, NCAA, and associated institutions.

Breach of Title IX?

The plaintiffs argue that permitting a transgender female athlete to compete in women's sports and use their locker room facilities constitutes a breach of Title IX, a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in educational programmes. They further contend that this decision caused them emotional trauma, asserting that they were “repeatedly emotionally traumatised” by the infringement on their privacy.

Former NCAA Division I swimmers Kaitlynn Wheeler and Paula Scanlan spoke at a rally in Springfield, Illinois, on July 13, 2023, in support of Abbigail Wheeler.

The lawsuit also accuses university administrators of imposing pro-transgender ideology on the athletes, further exacerbating their emotional distress. According to the plaintiffs, their concerns were dismissed as a “psychological issue,” with advice to seek counselling if they struggled with Thomas's participation in the team.

“I never expected my Ivy League education to teach me that women must silently accept losing their opportunities and privacy,” said Grace Estabrook in a press release. “Women’s sports and the leaders who oversee them should not prioritise men’s feelings over fairness and integrity.”

Concerns Over Locker Room Access

The lawsuit also highlights the distress caused by Thomas’s access to the women’s locker room. Initially, the athletes were told that Thomas would not be using the same locker room, but this arrangement changed, and Kaczorowski was reportedly left in tears upon learning that Thomas would indeed be allowed access.

It is further claimed that the women were pressured into silence, with the threat of expulsion from the team if they voiced objections to Thomas’s participation. The three athletes were allegedly informed by their coach, Mike Schnur, that failure to accept Thomas would result in their removal from the team.

At the 2022 Ivy League Championships, Thomas went on to win both the 500-yard and 200-yard freestyle events, sparking a wider debate over fairness in women’s sports.

The Debate Rages On

President Trump’s executive order, signed this week, aligns with ongoing discussions about the future of women’s sports and transgender participation. The order invokes Title IX, reaffirming its intention to prevent discrimination based on biological sex. This executive action is part of a broader commitment to defend women’s sports against what Trump has referred to as “transgender lunacy,” a term he used during a rally in support of the 2024 election.

Trump also vowed to instruct Secretary of State Marco Rubio to communicate to the International Olympic Committee the US government’s opposition to allowing transgender women to compete in women’s sports. These remarks have prompted intense reactions from both supporters and opponents of transgender participation in athletic competitions.

Real-Life Experiences of Former Athletes

Former competitors of Thomas have also shared their feelings of discomfort and fear while competing against the transgender swimmer. One such athlete, Kylee Alons, recalled her emotional response after witnessing Thomas’s victory in the 500m freestyle. Alons described the experience as a “nightmare,” adding that the situation left her feeling unsafe in the locker room, where Thomas was also permitted to change.

“We were never consulted. We were never provided with a choice or an alternative. We were simply expected to accept the situation,” said former University of Kentucky swimmer Kaitlynn Wheeler. “To advocate for ourselves would result in being labelled as intolerant, hateful, or bigoted.”

The Growing Legislative Push

The controversy surrounding transgender athletes in women’s sports has prompted legislative action in several states. Just last week, the Georgia state Senate approved the ‘Fair and Safe Athletic Opportunities Act’, which mandates that athletes must compete on teams corresponding to their biological sex. If enacted, Georgia would become the 26th state to implement such regulations.

As debates over transgender participation in sports continue, the legal proceedings initiated by Estabrook, Holmquist, and Kaczorowski signal a growing divide over the interpretation of Title IX and the protection of women’s sports. With more states introducing legislation to restrict transgender participation, it remains to be seen how courts and lawmakers will address these complex issues.

Lia Thomas' participation in women's sports has sparked significant debate. As the first transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division 1 title, Thomas’s achievements have led to contrasting opinions. On one hand, her success represents a breakthrough for transgender inclusion in athletics, showcasing how sport can be a platform for social change and visibility for trans individuals. On the other hand, critics argue that allowing Thomas, a biologically male athlete, to compete in women’s events undermines the fairness of women’s sports, as she may have physical advantages over cisgender female competitors.

Who is Jo Ellis: Transgender Soldier Wrongly Linked to DC Plane Crash