HMRC Wins Appeal in £200 Million Tax Case Against BlueCrest Capital Management.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has secured a victory in its appeal against BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP, placing the hedge fund management firm at risk of facing a potential £200 million tax liability. The Court of Appeal recently ruled that certain salaried members of the limited liability partnership (LLP) qualified as employees for tax purposes. This ruling is significant as it could potentially lead to a substantial income tax and national insurance contributions liability.

The case, The Commissioners for HMRC v Bluecrest Capital Management (UK) LLP, centers on whether members of BlueCrest were receiving disguised salaries. The case follows HMRC's conclusion that the vast majority of BlueCrest's members, except for four, were, in fact, receiving disguised salaries rather than profits. As a result, the LLP was assessed for around £142 million in income tax and £55.3 million in national insurance contributions over five tax years.

BlueCrest contested the decision at the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), which sided with the hedge fund on certain issues, including portfolio managers with allocations of $100 million or more and desk heads. However, the tribunal rejected BlueCrest's appeal for other portfolio managers and all non-portfolio members.

Both parties subsequently appealed to the Upper Tribunal, where HMRC argued that no members had significant influence over the partnership’s operations and that they should be classed as employees. The Upper Tribunal upheld the FTT’s decision, prompting HMRC to appeal once again.

Delivering the lead judgment, Sir Launcelot Henderson, with the support of Lord Justice Lewison and Lord Justice Arnold, agreed that the conditions outlined in the Finance Act 2014 had been met. Specifically, it was determined that all relevant members, including portfolio managers and desk heads, were receiving disguised salaries not linked to the LLP's profits or losses. The judges also clarified that a key point was the absence of substantial influence over the partnership’s operations.

Sir Launcelot Henderson further stated: “If my view of the true construction of Condition B is correct, I can see no escape from the conclusion that both tribunals erred in law in accepting the wider construction reflected in HMRC’s published guidance. I believe the only just action is to overturn the Upper Tribunal's decision and send the case back to the FTT for a reevaluation of the evidence based on the correct standard.”

The Court of Appeal's ruling means the case will now return to the FTT for a fresh examination of the evidence, based on the correct interpretation of the law. BlueCrest faces a considerable financial risk depending on how the tribunal reconsiders the case, and the outcome of this ongoing legal battle could have broader implications for other LLPs and hedge fund managers across the UK.

The Commissioners for HMRC v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP focuses on whether certain BlueCrest members were receiving disguised salaries. HMRC argued that many individuals within the hedge fund were treated as self-employed partners, despite receiving fixed compensation, typically seen with employees. This classification could result in a significant tax liability if the members are redefined as employees.

The dispute centres on the interpretation of the Finance Act 2014, which distinguishes between salaried members and those with significant influence over a partnership’s operations. BlueCrest opposed HMRC’s view, arguing that members were genuinely operating as partners. However, the Court of Appeal agreed with HMRC, asserting that members receiving fixed compensation without substantial control should be classified as employees.

This ruling is significant, as it could set a precedent for how similar firms classify their members, particularly in sectors like hedge funds, where the distinction between employees and partners can be legally complex. The case also highlights the importance of accurate classification for tax purposes.

The Finance Act 2014 introduced changes to UK tax laws, particularly around disguised remuneration for members of limited liability partnerships (LLPs). It aimed to prevent individuals from being treated as self-employed partners while effectively acting as salaried employees. The Act defines members as employees if they lack significant control over the partnership's operations, which is central to the case of The Commissioners for HMRC v Bluecrest Capital Management (UK) LLP. This distinction impacts how income tax and national insurance contributions are applied.

HMRC and small business tax evasion