Texas Law Challenged by Court: A Victory for Free Speech.

A district court has halted the enforcement of a Texas law after a lawsuit filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine. The controversial law, the Securing Children Online through Parental Empowerment Act (SCOPE Act), aimed to limit minors' access to protected speech while imposing strict age-verification requirements on social media platforms. Judge Robert Pitman of the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction, finding that the law was overly broad and unconstitutional.

“The court determined that Texas’s law was likely unconstitutional because its provisions restricted protected speech and were so vague that it made it hard to know what was prohibited,” said Bob Corn-Revere, Chief Counsel of FIRE. “States can’t block adults from engaging with legal speech in the name of protecting children, nor can they keep minors from ideas that the government deems unsuitable.”

The SCOPE Act sought to mandate age verification on social media, requiring platforms to monitor content deemed harmful to minors. If harmful content exceeded a certain threshold, users would need to verify their age, potentially creating barriers for adults who are hesitant to provide sensitive data like driver’s licenses or biometric information.

Judge Pitman highlighted concerns over vague definitions, questioning how terms such as "substance abuse," "eating disorders," and "grooming" could be interpreted. “At what point… does alcohol use become ‘substance abuse?’” the judge asked. “What defines ‘grooming’ and ‘harassment?’”

FIRE's lawsuit, filed on behalf of several plaintiffs, including a 16-year-old student from El Paso, challenged the law’s impact on free speech. “Young people have free speech rights, too,” said Cameron Samuels, Executive Director of Students Engaged in Advancing Texas (SEAT). “The SCOPE Act would make youth less informed, less active, and less engaged on some of the most important issues facing the nation.”

This legal victory follows a previous ruling where Judge Pitman blocked content moderation rules from the same law. Adam Sieff, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine, celebrated the decision as a win for free expression. “This is a tremendous victory against government censorship,” Sieff said. “The Court enjoined every substantive provision of the SCOPE Act we challenged.”

The case is part of a broader national conversation, with courts in multiple states striking down similar age-verification laws. The Supreme Court is set to review these issues, with potential nationwide implications for the regulation of online speech.

“We hope this decision will give other states pause before broadly restricting free expression online,” said Corn-Revere. “What these laws have in common is that they seek to impose simplistic one-size-fits-all solutions to address complicated problems.”

The ruling against the SCOPE Act underscores the ongoing legal battle over online speech regulation and its impact on constitutional rights.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and preserving the individual rights of students and faculty members in American colleges and universities. Founded in 1999, FIRE advocates for the protection of free speech, religious freedom, due process, and academic freedom. It works to ensure that individuals can express their ideas without fear of censorship or retaliation. FIRE offers legal and public advocacy support for cases involving violations of First Amendment rights and educates the public about the importance of free expression on college campuses and beyond. Through its efforts, FIRE strives to maintain a society where diverse viewpoints are protected and freedom of speech is upheld.

Texas AG Ken Paxton Fights for Age Verification on Adult Websites