Macquarie University Sparks Backlash Over 'Settler' and 'Guest' Labels for Non-Indigenous Students.
Macquarie University is facing criticism after asking students to complete training modules that label non-Indigenous Australians as "settlers" and "guests." The controversial content, part of a broader course on Indigenous culture, has sparked an outcry among students and commentators alike, with accusations that the language is divisive and accusatory.
The Controversy: What’s in the Modules?
The training modules, which form part of Macquarie University's introductory student courses, include a segment on Aboriginal Australians. Non-Indigenous students are reportedly told, "If you are living in Australia and are not an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, you are a settler and therefore a guest."
The module advises students to "ensure they have a deeper understanding of colonialism" and acknowledges that "guests" may worry about causing offense. Critics argue that this language is alienating and divisive, rather than fostering understanding.
The Backlash: Critics Speak Out
Ben Fordham, host of the popular 2GB radio show, was quick to voice his displeasure. "I don’t care if you became an Aussie last week, this is your country too, you are not a guest," he said, rejecting the idea that any Australian—regardless of their background—should be considered a "guest" in their own nation.
Yannick Thoraval, a creative writing teacher at RMIT University, also criticized the language. While acknowledging the importance of addressing colonialism, he warned that the terminology used in the training could "polarize" students instead of encouraging constructive dialogue. "We should focus on language that brings us together, not divides us further," he added.
Macquarie University's Response
In defense of the training, a Macquarie University spokesperson stated that the modules are designed to ensure compliance with national safety and anti-discrimination standards. They added that similar training programs are used by other universities and in Australian workplaces.
“While students are required to complete these modules, no student will be denied access to their courses if they have not completed them,” the spokesperson clarified.
The Wider Debate: ‘Groupthink’ or Education?
The controversy quickly spread beyond Macquarie University, with students from other Australian institutions—such as La Trobe and James Cook University—reporting similar concerns. Libertarian NSW Legislative Council member John Ruddick also weighed in, suggesting that universities are attempting to enforce "groupthink" through politically charged training.
"These universities are trying to brainwash students by pushing left-wing ideologies," Ruddick argued.
The Bigger Picture: Divisiveness or Awareness?
The debate highlights a growing divide over how Australia should address its colonial past and the role of non-Indigenous citizens in contemporary society. Proponents of the training argue that it’s essential for students to understand the historical context of Indigenous issues, while critics believe the approach is overly accusatory and risks alienating the very people it aims to educate.
While the training is framed as a way to foster inclusivity and awareness, the backlash suggests that, for some, it may do the opposite—furthering division rather than unity.
A Divisive Issue in Modern Education
This controversy raises important questions about the role of universities in shaping political and social perspectives. Are such modules effective tools for raising awareness, or do they risk fostering resentment and division? As the debate continues, it’s clear that issues surrounding colonialism, race, and identity are far from settled—and the language we use to discuss them will remain a point of contention.
