a system that sets a regional standard for innovation and equity in dispute resolution. With your expertise in dispute resolution, what are the most common types of disputes you encounter in construction contracts in the UAE? The most common types of disputes I encounter typically fall into the following key categories: - Delay and Extension of Time (EOT) Claims - Variations and Change Orders - Termination of Contract - Liquidated Damages - Force Majeure and Unforeseen Events These disputes are often driven by high risks, tight schedules, and complex contractual frameworks. How do cultural and legal differences in the UAE influence dispute resolution strategies compared to other regions? Legally, compared to common law jurisdictions where precedent plays a major role, the UAE courts rely more on codified statutes, which affects how contract terms, especially clauses like force majeure and liquidated damages, are interpreted. These differences highlight the importance of drafting clear contract conditions. It also emphasizes how alternative dispute resolution methods are becoming increasingly welcomed in mega and complex projects in the UAE. Culturally, relationships and trust play a significant role, as parties may seek to maintain long-term relationships and avoid direct conflict. Negotiation and mediation tend to be preferred in the early stages of disputes, rather than escalating them to formal legal proceedings. Can you walk us through your approach to assessing a dispute and determining the best course of action for resolution? My methodology follows a well-organized framework to thoughtfully address the issues at hand. It begins with a comprehensive understanding of the situation, which involves an in-depth review of all relevant facts, evidence, and legal considerations. This analytical stage is crucial as it lays the foundation for informed decision-making. Next, the focus shifts to thoroughly assessing the underlying dispute. This involves unravelling the complexities of the situation and considering the interests of all parties involved, ensuring that no aspect is overlooked. Following this assessment, the process moves toward identifying the most suitable resolution method. This step is pivotal in selecting a strategy that aligns with the dispute’s distinct circumstances and the stakeholders’ needs. Once a resolution method is determined, the emphasis is placed on fostering collaborative and transparent communication. Open discussions are initiated to ensure that all parties have the opportunity to express their views and concerns, promoting an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding. As options are evaluated, each choice is carefully considered with the goal of finding a resolution that meets everyone’s interests. This iterative process culminates in the formalization of agreements, creating a solid basis for all parties to move forward with confidence and clarity. By adhering to this structured approach, the process promotes fairness, enhances clarity, and cultivates a deeper mutual understanding among all stakeholders involved. What role does effective communication play in preventing disputes, and how do you foster open dialogue among stakeholders? Effective communication plays a pivotal role in minimizing project risks and, 24 LAWYER MONTHLY DECEMBER 2024
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mjk3Mzkz