My duty is to provide honest, straightforward assessment, even if it is not always popular. as examining driver qualifications, compliance, company practices, and maintenance records, to name a few critical challenges. Meanwhile, construction cases require an in-depth understanding of safety standards, liability law regarding contractors and subcontractors, and accepted engineering principles within the industry and jurisdiction. Coordinating with industry experts and managing the vast amounts of documentation typical in these cases also demands precision and effective organization as a foundational approach to the case. My experience has honed my ability to synthesize this information into a cohesive defense, addressing both technical details and legal arguments in a streamlined and effective manner. No matter how complex a case, what every case requires is a solid team. Skill in handling and managing these high-stakes cases is only as good as the energy and time spent on building a team that can help implement this approach for my clients to achieve their goals. Can you share insights into your strategy for managing highrisk, large-dollar cases, and how you ensure effective communication with your clients throughout the process? High-risk cases start with a thorough risk assessment, identifying the strengths and vulnerabilities of all parties involved. From there, I establish a fluid plan with multiple contingency options, should the case take unexpected turns. I prioritize open communication with clients, ensuring they are updated at each major milestone so that they understand the implications of the decisions they make. This approach not only helps mitigate risk but also ensures clients are informed and educated about the direction of their case. It is my duty to provide an honest, straightforward assessment of the strengths and vulnerabilities my client’s case, even if those assessments are not always the most popular. Clients hire me to be upfront with them about the risks associated with those “bet the company” cases, and I do not shy away from that responsibility, whether it is popular or not. In your experience, what factors contribute to successful negotiations in highexposure litigation, and how do you balance aggressive defense with the need for resolution? Successful negotiations require a clear understanding of the case’s value and potential exposure, paired with a willingness to adapt as evidence evolves. In high-exposure cases, a strong defensive stance can signal strength, while a readiness to negotiate demonstrates pragmatism. I aim to strike a balance by thoroughly preparing for trial and engaging in evidence-backed negotiations. This dual approach often 48 LAWYER MONTHLY DECEMBER 2024
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mjk3Mzkz